Home | eBook | Advisors/ Career Counselors | Bookstore | Library | Student Association | Links | Archives | FAQ | Contact

Feature Interview for July 2009

The Interview of the Month for July, 2009, features Dave Mumby, Associate Professor of Psychology, at Concordia University. He is an undergraduate and graduate student advisor, and author of the bestselling eBook, Graduate School: Winning Strategies for Getting In With or Without Excellent Grades. © 2004

Posted July 6th, 2009

courtesy of Zehawk

We asked Dave Mumby (DM) for his thoughts on several topics related to the process of preparing for graduate school, and some of the mistakes that some students tend to make during the application process. Part 1 of the interview appeared in May, 2009. Here is part 2:

MGS: You mentioned earlier that many students overestimate the role of grades and grade-point-averages in determining who gets accepted into some graduate programs. What other miscalculations do students frequently make?

  DM: I think most students overestimate the degree of objectivity, in general, that goes into making final decisions about who gets in and who doesn’t. Numerical indicators, such as GPAs or qualifying-test scores, often play a significant role mainly in the preliminary stages of the selection process. Because these measuring tools simplify the job of comparing applicants in certain aspects of academic background and preparation, this is where a selection committee or individual professor will often begin the process of ranking a group of applicants. But many other factors still come into play after that, and when it comes to the final selections, the most heavily-weighted factors are often character attributes, such as judgment, emotional maturity, or the ability to cope under pressure. The successful applicants are usually those who make the best impressions of character.

MGS: How is that accomplished? I suppose the applicant’s letter of intent or personal statement contributes to those impressions?

  DM: Yes, indeed. The personal statement goes a long way toward displaying a student’s judgment and maturity, for example, by virtue of what she chooses to say and how she says it. Unsuccessful applicants sometimes fall out of the competition because their personal statements send unintended messages that make a bad impression about some aspect of character. For example, some applicants come across as too naïve about the true nature of their chosen field. This might happen quite inadvertently, for example, if they display unrealistic expectations about the career opportunities that are likely to follow a Masters degree or Ph.D.

  The personal statement must also be crafted in a tactful manner. By that I mean its not just about what you include -- its also about how you state certain things. Stating the right things in the right ways can make you appear confident and knowledgeable, but saying the same things in the wrong way can make you appear smug and arrogant. No one wants smug and arrogant people around, so this is a legitimate basis for rejecting an applicant.

  MGS: That makes a lot of sense, and its not really surprising. So, why would anyone underestimate the importance of how they come across as a person?

  DM: No, its not surprising that these things matter, and I think most students are aware that how they come across as a person is important. But I think many fail to realize just how important, and that’s partly because of the tendency to assume that final selections are made on the basis of academic credentials, research experience, a portfolio of creative achievements, or some other objective criteria. It seems like that would somehow be more fair and impartial than making selections based on personality. I think, though, that even if it can be considered more fair, it might not a reasonable thing to expect. The fact is that in the majority of graduate programs -- especially at the Ph.D. level, but also in most Master’s programs – a single person makes the decision about the acceptance or rejection of a particular applicant. That person is the potential graduate advisor, the faculty member who has the most at stake in the decision, because he or she will have to spend a lot of time with any new graduate student for at least a few years. Meanwhile, most faculty members are not required to accept a new graduate student in any given year, and for a lot of us, the number of graduate students we supervise has little or no impact on our salary. Of course, supervising and training graduate students has its rewards, but not when the interpersonal relationship with the student is difficult. Given all these considerations, it seems unreasonable to expect that objective qualities alone would play a significant role in the decision-making process.

  MGS: Letters of recommendation can also contribute to a student’s character impression, at least if the writers of those letters choose to mention relevant things. But that is not under the student’s control, is it?

  DM: But its not entirely out of the student’s control, either. Students who plan to go to graduate school need to somehow get involved in the research or other scholarly activity of faculty members at their college or university. This is how most faculty members get to know a few students well enough each year that are able to then write effective letters of recommendation. Students need letters from professors who actually know relevant things about them, and this requires some type of interaction outside of the classroom.

  Students who are proactive about placing themselves in situations that allow a professor to get to know relevant things about their character usually end up with effective letters of recommendation. Setting them up properly takes time, though, so students need to act several months in advance of when they will actually need the letters. Most students do not figure this out until it is too late to make the most of the opportunities. In those cases, the student is lucky to end up with even one effective letter, and will probably have to ask other professors who hardly know them for the others. Even if the letters say positive things about the student, they are unlikely to be very convincing for the person reading them. Comments about the strengths of a student are most convincing if they are backed up by relevant anecdotes, but those will not be available if the person writing the letter has no relevant experiences involving the student.

MGS: What if the student is in an academic department where only a few of the faculty members are active in research? It might be hard to find good opportunities to volunteer to help with research. Are there other ways to get experience and allow professors to get to know you outside of the classroom?

  DM: Students who are serious about pursuing graduate school should make a habit of attending events hosted in their academic department, such as lectures by invited guests. Everyone sees notices for these kinds of presentations posted on bulletin boards around campus all the time. Few undergraduate students pay much attention to these notices. I think many just ignore them because they assume that guest lectures are only intended for professors and graduate students.

  But serious students who plan to go to graduate school themselves someday should also attend these events. It is an excellent way to gain some insight into the kinds of work done by experts in particular disciplines or fields of research. If a student makes it a habit to attend some of these types of events, the faculty members who also regularly attend will get used to seeing the student around. Some will probably come to recognize the student as someone who is committed and dedicated to the field, and who has enough intrinsic interest in it to come listen to a lecture that won’t be on any test later on. This reputation might make a big difference down the road when asking faculty members for letters of recommendation for graduate school.

  Students might also be able to take advantage of some kind of mentoring program at their school. These types of programs are usually run by the alumni association or by student-placement services. A typical way that mentor programs work is that students are matched with alumni who rely on their personal and professional experience to give students advice about career options and insight into the realities of the workplace. In some programs, students spend time observing or helping the mentor on the job. The mentor, of course, may be a good reference for the student later on when it comes for graduate school applications.

    MGS: Beyond the importance of character and personality factors, are there other important factors that students tend to underestimate when planning for graduate school?

DM Students applying to Ph.D. programs, or to Masters program that involve a thesis, typically have to find a faculty member who will serve as their graduate advisor. Many students underestimate the importance of contacting their potential graduate advisors before they even apply to that program. There are so many reasons why this is essential, but the bottom line is that both the student and the potential graduate advisor need to know enough about each other before either one of them can be certain that its a good idea to work together.

MGS: Any advice on how to contact a potential graduate advisor?

  DM: The first contact should be a brief email message in which you indicate who you are, a bit about your academic background, and your interest in doing your graduate studies . It should be brief and to the point… but, you also want to make sure you invite this person to find out more about you and your plans, in case they actually want to. The message should also ask for some kind of reply, but remember that many professors are bad at replying to messages, and many will need a reminder, so if you don’t get a reply within a week, or so, try sending the same brief message again. A third attempt might even be necessary if you still haven’t heard back from your potential graduate advisor after another week. Make sure not to become a pest, however, and if someone simply never gets back to you, it may be revealing something about how they tend to deal with their students. Maybe you should reconsider whether you really want this person as your graduate advisor.

[Editor’s note: More on this subject can be found in eChapter 4 of Dr. Mumby’s eBook].

MGS: Contacting a potential graduate advisor seems a bit intimidating to a lot of students. No doubt, it carries certain risks. What if you make a bad first impression?

  DM: Well, that’s true… it is risky for that reason. But failing to do it is even more risky. There are just too many benefits to making this kind of contact with your potential graduate advisors before you apply. Students need to consider that other applicants, with whom they are competing, may take this step, and many professors are reluctant to accept any new graduate student who has not made this kind of contact.

  Even a few brief emails back-and-forth can be enough to size-up a student, and potential advisors may want to take advantage of the opportunity. They have a lot at stake. They will be making a long-term commitment to any student they accept to supervise. Many insist on having some assurance that the student is someone who is enjoyable to work with, and many will never accept a new graduate student without this assurance, no matter how impressive the academic or research potential of the student. I follow that policy myself, and I know it has helped me dodge more than a few bullets in my career.

MGS: You mean students who looked good on paper, but lacked personal skills, would have probably been unpleasant to have as a graduate student?

  DM: Yes, that’s what I mean. But I also suspect some of the students I choose not to accept are actually fine students and wonderful individuals, and who would be great to work with -- its just that they fail to convey that impression with the few opportunities they have. In workshops and seminars on applying to graduate school, students and I often discuss ways to make sure this does not happen. We discuss things to do and errors to avoid when contacting a potential graduate advisor.

  Still, a student can never know exactly how that person will respond, and often there is no way of getting around the need for good social intuition to avoid making a bad impression. Some students still make a bad impression despite trying very hard to avoid it. A potential graduate student who is basically a jerk will probably not be able convey a different persona. But it happens to people who aren’t jerks, too. Often, they are trying too hard to guess what the potential graduate advisor wants to read or hear. What that person really wants to know is the truth about the kind of person the student is.

MGS: Any special advice for students who feel intimidated by the prospect of contacting potential graduate advisors?

  DM:  Students should remember that while professors do need to know about the character and personality of potential graduate students, this is also something that students should be out to discover about their potential graduate advisors, too. Many students disregard this completely when choosing where to apply, and its amazing how many students detect serious warning signals but chose to ignore them. They end up in a miserable situation with a graduate advisor they strongly dislike. This is one of the more common reasons why some students end up dropping out of graduate school. It happens more often than students dropping out because they fail to meet the performance requirements.

MGS: Your book, as well as your eBook, has a large and rather detailed section on how to properly prepare a cover letter. I have not seen that topic covered so extensively in other books. Why do you put so much emphasis on the cover letter?

DM: Mostly for the much same reasons we have just been discussing -- because the first impressions that students make are extremely influential. And here, again, I’m talking about first impressions of personality and character. For most people who review grad-school applications, the cover letter provides the first view of the student as a person. Much of the advice I give students about cover letters focuses on keeping it simple and brief, but thoroughly informative about the purpose and content of the application. Using the proper formatting conventions for a letter like this can go a long way to convey some level of professionalism, and straying too far from convention can make the applicant appear immature, sloppy, or just ignorant about how to write a formal cover letter. Unfortunately, a lot of students fit that latter description, and the cover letter can be a huge challenge for them, as they try to figure out not only what to put in the letter, but how to format it. I advise students to learn proper letter-writing as a general skill, because its one that they will use often in graduate school, and perhaps for a long time after that, too.

[Editor’s note: More on this subject can be found in eChapter 8 of Dr. Mumby’s eBook].

MGS: Dr. Mumby, thank-you for sharing your time with us.



 

 
Home | E-Book | Advisors/ Career Counselors | Bookstore | Library | Student Association | Links | FAQ | Contact | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Website Copyright 2009 | Website designed by Rob Ziruolo